Restoration Strategy: City on the Hill or Judgement?

Our Founders clearly understood the historical significance or their forefathers coming to the New World especially the Northern colonies.  The Significance of the First Great Awakening uniting the colonies to stand on Liberty goes back to those first settlers.  Over the last 150 years, the infiltration of socialism into the Churches has obviated the real spirit of America’s view of Liberty in every sense.

I find the following to be a key to the Strategy for Reclaiming America to Founders Intent for Life, Liberty and Property!  If you only read the Preface and Introduction in the linked book, you will gain more historical insight of our Foundational Strategies for Liberty than from any modern pundit or party strategist.  Not only that, you will learn that what is acceptable in the various political, cultural and even economic arenas was rejected by our Founders for a much different Strategy for the Greatness of America.

Will we again be the City on the Hill or continue in Judgement?

I have been asked by Pastors, Priest and Rabbi’s what is written historically that substantiates the contrarian position of a 501c3, being the idea that there is “NO” separation of Church & State, and the way many were taught to view or preach Romans 13.  Also, I have been told and experienced that it has proven to be more difficult for Lay Leaders to know about the truths of the Founding principles and therefore many times inhibit the Pastors from exercising their views that would more align with Founders Principles.

Many of you know that when I speak to various group meetings, I reference the First Great Awakening in its totality as the unifying factor in the American Revolution.  Yet, it was greater then that – as proven in this work “The Pulpits of The American Revolution.”  Seminaries, Bible Schools or Rabbinical Schools don’t teach this!  They don’t even discuss the historical significance of these sermons as they relate to the extensible principle of Liberty.

I will leave the opportunity to you to download the file since it is 27 mb.  I am pasting the “Preface” here for you to get a hint of the flavor for this work.  The challenge is to bring the Teaching and Preaching of our Foundations to the present and restore Liberty as was preached and inculcated into those first 200 years of America and the expectations of those that sacrificed all so that we would understand and promote the Liberty they taught and secured for their posterity.

To me, this is one of the missing keys to emboldening believers to Action at this critical juncture in our history.

The links are:
Source Link: https://archive.org/details/thepulpit00thoruoft
The pdf book I prefer:  https://ia700201.us.archive.org/6/items/thepulpit00thoruoft/thepulpit00thoruoft_bw.pdf

The preface to the book:

PREFACE.

THE true alliance between Politics and Religion is the lesson inculcated in this volume of Sermons, and apparent in “THE PULPIT OF THE REVOLUTION” It is the voice of the Fathers of the Republic, enforced by their example. They invoked God in their civil assemblies, called upon their chosen teachers of religion for counsel from the Bible, and recognized its precepts as the law of their public conduct. The Fathers did not divorce politics and religion, but they denounced these parathion as ungodly. They prepared for the struggle, and went into battle, not as soldiers of fortune, but, like Cromwell and the soldiers of the Commonwealth, with the Word of God in their hearts, and trusting in him. This was the secret of that moral energy which sustained the Republic in its material weakness against superior numbers, and discipline, and all the power of England. To these Sermons — the responses from the Pulpit — the State affixed its imprimatur, and thus they were handed down to future generations with a two-fold claim to respect.

The Union of the colonies was a condition precedent to American Nationality. One nationality, and that of a Protestant people, was essential to constitutional liberty in America. If the colonies had become separate independencies at different times, America would have but repeated the history of European divisions and wars. The combination and balance of forces necessary to the grand result seems to have been calculated with the nicety of a formula. France, the champion of the Papal system of intellectual and political slavery and despotism, and England, the assertor of enlightened freedom, competed for the dominion of America. The red cross of St. George shielded the brotherhood of English Protestants from the extermination meditated by Papal France, whose military cordon reached along our northern and western frontiers, and thus insured to England the fealty of her Atlantic colonies, till, “in the fulness of time,” France, by the treaty of 1763, relinquished Canada. Then the colonies, relieved from the hostile pressure, became restless under the restraints of dependency, and England was the only power whose strength and common relation to them could at once endanger the liberty of all, impel them to a league of domestic amity, and bind them in fraternal resistance to a common enemy. But a brief contest would have left danger of colonial disintegration; and the stupid obstinacy of George III was necessary to prolong the war in order to blend the colonists, by communion under a national flag, in national feeling, and by general intercourse, common interests, and common sufferings. So God formed the fair Temple of American Liberty.

In his Election Sermon of 1783, republished in this volume, President Stiles says, with sublime eloquence, that Jefferson “POURED THE SOUL OF THE CONTINENT INTO THE MONUMENTAL ACT OF INDEPENDENCE.” The SOUL of the Revolution is embodied in documents like these, rather than in the statistics of sieges and battles, which were the fruits of their inspiration, and, under God, the vindication of their truth.

The second Discourse in this volume is on the Repeal of the Stamp Act. The colonists, sheltered under the flag of England, permitted her to regulate their foreign commerce; but the Stamp Act violated their domestic independence; and they showed, by custom, by equity, and by their charters from the king, that Parliament had no jurisdiction within their territories, and they refused to submit. England sent her armies to compel submission, and the colonists appealed to Heaven. The Stamp Act[1] involved the principle in dispute for the next eighteen years.

In his Sermon of 1750, Jonathan Mayhew declared the Christian principles of government in the faith of which Washington, ordained of God, won liberty for America, not less for England, and ultimately for the world; so that the engraving of Mayhew and that of the Stamp fitly introduce these Sermons of the Revolution. By the conflict with her children, England herself was rescued from the slough of unlimited power into which she was fast drifting under George III. The reaction roused her from political apathy, and revived the ancient principles of freedom. By defeating England, America saved the liberty of both. Both governments rest upon the right of revolution, and the will of the people is the constitutional basis of each.

On presenting his credentials as American ambassador, June 1, 1785, Mr. Adams, in his address to King George III., said: “I shall esteem myself the happiest of men if I can be instrumental in restoring an entire esteem, confidence, and affection; or, in better words, the old good-nature and the old good-humor between people, who, although separated by ocean, and under different governments, have the same language, a similar religion, and kindred blood.”[2]          God grant that this benign spirit of generous brotherhood, this blessed unity of which he was the Author, may never be imperiled by malign counsels. Now, after three-quarters of a century, these ties of nature, stronger than treaties, reassert their genial sway;  and the heir of the Throne of England the guest of the Nation and the President of the Republic stand reverently at the Tomb of WASHINGTON.

_________________________________________________

Footnotes:

[1] A stamp duty was a familiar tax in England. It had existed as far back as 4th William and Mary, 1694; and the act of 1765 was simply to “extend”1A this mode of taxing to the colonies. The engraving upon the title-page was taken from a veritable stamp, issued under that act, and loaned to the publishers by Mr. Samuel Foster Haven, of the American Antiquarian Society, through Mr. Charles Emery Stevens, of Worcester, whose valuable suggestions in the preparation of the work are also grate fully acknowledged. The impression is on a blue, spongy paper, capable of receiving a sharp, distinct outline, in which was imbedded a slip of lead, or soft white metal, as indicated in the engraving. The paper is pasted on parchment, and on the reverse is the  royal cipher, “G.R.” America“ was the only difference between the English and American stamps. They were issued in sheets, like our postage stamps.

1A  Bancroft s U. S., iv. ch. viii; Knight s England, vi. 271.

[2] See Index, “America and England, Unity of.”

BOSTON, Nov. 21, 1860.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s